Breaking the Chain…

2 07 2009

… temporarily.

Until such time as I can satisfactorily organise my various links, I’ve decided to remove them rather than risk offending anybody who might notice that theirs has suddenly gone missing. It feels strange to remove links to websites run by my friends (and websites that I read, no less), but it is my intention to limit them to those that have a direct bearing on either Biblical Studies, the Ancient Near East, syntax and morphology, or Semitic literature. I hope to have my new list up soon!





The King is Dead

26 06 2009

Ultimately felled by the malignant slander of those greedy for gossip or gold, Michael Jackson passed away yesterday afternoon. The cause of death has been given as coronary failure.

For years now, he has been the punchline of gaudy jokes, and the cause of many a shaken head. I would be lying if I pretended that I never found humour in his tragic story, nor concern in the tales of his odd behaviour. But I would also be lying were I to pretend that I ever suspected him of the rank crimes of which he was accused.

His music has been an inspiration and his downfall a sad and cautionary tale. May he rest in peace, with his broken heart.





Bible and Critical Theory Seminar – update

23 06 2009

The new timetable for the 15th Bible and Critical Theory Seminar is now up, on Roland’s blog. I am listed as “TBA”, which actually stands for “The Biggest Apikorus”. I used to be “Torah’s Brightest Admirer” but then, “Tempted By Atheism”, I “Tossed Belief Aside” and became “Troubled, But Academic”. Contrary to what some people think, being an apikorus is not about “Taunting Believing Adults”, but is really just about “Teaching Bible Areligiously”. Still, it’s no great shock if there are some people out there who feel I need “To Be Advised”.





Bible and Critical Theory Seminar

14 06 2009

From the 10th to the 11th of July, Roland Boer is hosting the 15th Bible and Critical Theory Seminar in Newcastle, NSW. And, if spending 24 hours pontificating about scriptural exegesis were not glorious enough, it is to be held at The Grand Hotel, ye bastion of the amber nectar! I urge all interested readers to contact Dr Roland Boer, who might be reached via his blog, and express your interest!

The paper that I am going to present is entitled “If I Forget You: A linguistic and stylistic analysis of Psalm 137″.

Update: My paper is going to be focusing upon the final line of the psalm and suggesting that, rather than being viewed as stylistically dissonant, it actually indicates a great deal concerning the author’s sitz im leben, and helps us tentatively propose a date of composition. Further to that, this information then gives us a new lens through which to read the rest of the psalm, and highlights an area of irony that reveals much of the author’s identification as a(n ex-patriate) Judean. I look forward to being able to give you more information on this as we get closer to the date of presentation.





Invoking Godwin

30 05 2009

I was somewhat embroiled, a short while ago, in an argument that took place in a rather benighted corner of the internet, the name of which I shall leave undisclosed. Posing as a Jew who was interested in conversion, I was pleased to be able to hear the opinions of Muslims in this fair city of mine, and find some common ground despite them not knowing my true identity. For the most part, this was a pleasantly affirming experience: I always suspected that the noisy yahoos were a minority and that when one sits down with reasonable people one will hear reasonable things. My timing, however, was altogether off. It was but a week after I had joined this site when Israel began their invasion of Gaza: an operation that, lest there should be any doubt of their intentions, they dubbed “Cast Lead”.

Read the rest of this entry »





Shout Out

26 05 2009

Just a quick note to say that I am going to be attending the World Congress of Jewish Studies at Hebrew University this August, as well as the following Workshop on Academic Hebrew. If there is anybody else out there who is also going to be attending either or both of those events, feel free to drop me a line! I am a little early to also give a “shout out” to those who will be at the SBL Annual General Meeting in New Orleans this November but, as I’ve already purchased my flights and my registration, I may as well mention that too.

The same goes for anybody who is in Sydney and who is going to be attending Limmud Oz this June. I shall be presenting two papers: one is on the inherent ambiguity in Deut 21:23 (in which I hope to demonstrate, with the aid of a number of ancient witnesses, that the confusion engendered by the clause runs back to the earliest sources), and the other is on a Babylonian Talmudic narrative that concerns Elisha ben Abuya, the sage who lost his faith in God and the nature of whose apostasy I find most inspirational.

Nothing else to announce except the fact that this has been one of my longest breaks from blogging yet. With several classes that I have had to prepare and then run, as well as a number of administrative issues that have arisen at the synagogue that saw fit to employ the likes of me (and not to mention the guilt of not writing my PhD, the very weight of which is heavier than the strain of actually writing one), I have been somewhat preoccupied. I would have expected to report on the decline in the number of hits, but it seems to have increased instead. The only difference is that now, instead of getting people who search for the title of a post that I have written, or the words “Hebrew Bible”, I am receiving visitations from those who seek advise on Hebrew tattoos. I do not mind in the slightest.





Yom HaShoah 5769

20 04 2009

I can’t believe that it’s already been a year since my last Yom HaShoah rant. Somewhat calmer this time, I instead thought that I might say a few words about the means by which this particular day of commemoration came to be, and some of the inherent problems with it.

Read the rest of this entry »





המבין יבין

14 03 2009

Last week, while attending a Purim service, I was caught off guard by the reader’s Kiddush. So far as I am aware, it is not customary for a kiddush to be a formal part of the Purim service, but it was not that that caught me off guard. What surprised me were the actual words and, as soon as the service was over, I grabbed a copy of them for myself. I am a little too late to honour the festival with some silliness of my own, but in a general spirit of frivolity, I bequeath it to the internet. A translation follows, although it is worth pointing out that the chief beauty of the piece lies in its similarity to the Kiddush recited on Friday night. If you are unfamiliar with the Friday night Kiddush, you may just have to take my word for that.

Read the rest of this entry »





The Anterior Construction in Classical Hebrew, or “How to Serve a Glass of Wine”

3 03 2009

I have not read Ziony Zevit’s book, the title of which is also the title of (the first part of) this post, but I first encountered the phenomenon in a “ShulDrasha” by the Goblin King. The grammatical supposition is this: when the pluperfect is to be conveyed over any possible perfective reading, the waw-conjunctive is appended to the noun, rather than the verb.

An example:
וידע האדם* = “And the man knew [his wife]“
והאדם ידע (Gen 4:1) = “But the man had known [his wife]“

The practical upshot? That Cain had been born in the Garden of Eden, prior to the sin of his parents and the expulsion of his family.

Read the rest of this entry »





“God is Love”

21 02 2009

I bought a Bible yesterday. At $275, it is the most expensive single-volume Bible that I have ever purchased. It was printed in 1864 and, according to a handwritten inscription on the first page, it was gifted to a young man on the occasion of his 29th birthday in 1881. His name was Robert Alfred Hattersley and his anonymous mother wrote an inscription:

Teach the Scriptures and be wise

Robert Alfred Hattersley
Presented to him
By his Mother on his
29th Birthday,
December the 5th 1881

May the giver and the receiver
Meet in heaven
God is love

The following three pages present information as regards dates of births and deaths. Robert Hattersley died in 1885 at the age of 33. His wife, Ellen, died four years later, aged 36. Robert was survived by four sons and Ellen, after a second marriage, by another son born two years before her death. It would seem that the conveyor of this information was the eldest son, Charles Herbert Hattersley, who also saw fit to record his marriage to Rachel Elizabeth Hattersley and the birth of a child whom he named for himself. There is a bookmark (an empty envelope inscribed “Mum”, that I imagine once contained a birthday card), placed in the third chapter of the Gospel According to John. I can only assume that it is the famous sixteenth verse that prompted this placement, itself about the love of God.

Now this is all very pleasant but, I must say, the part that tickles me the most is the printed dedication to “THE MOST HIGH AND MIGHTY PRINCE JAMES” which, as it runs to over a page, I will not print here. I will, however, convey the first paragraph which, dripping and obsequious, strikes me as reminiscent of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’s pathetic pampering of King Claudius at the end of the third act:

Great and manifold were the blessings, most dread Sovereign, which Almighty God, the Father of all mercies, bestowed upon us the people of England, when first he sent Your Majesty’s Royal Person to rule and reign over us. For whereas it was the expectation of many, who wished not well unto our Sion, that upon the setting of that bright Occidental Star, Queen Elizabeth of most happy memory, some thick and palpable clouds of darkness would so have over-shadowed this Land, that men should have been in doubt which way they were to walk; and that it should hardly be known, who was to direct the unsettled State; the appearance of Your Majesty, as of the Sun in his strength, instantly dispelled those supposed and surmised mists, and gave unto all that were well affected exceeding cause of comfort; especially when we beheld the Government established in Your Highness, and Your Hopeful Seed, by an undoubted Title, and this also accompanied with peace and tranquillity at home and abroad.

Oh, drip drip.

I find most interesting the continual capitalisation of all nouns and pronouns that refer to His Majesty’s Royal Person when compared with the lower-case pronouns that refer to God, himself. Indeed, the final (and lengthiest) paragraph, which contains all manner of suspected traducement by “Popish Persons” and “selfconceited Brethren”, presents the Bible to its patron, “Your Majesty, not only as to our King and Sovereign, but as to the principal Mover and Author of the work.”