<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;God does not play dice&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benabuya.com/2008/10/06/god-does-not-play-dice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benabuya.com/2008/10/06/god-does-not-play-dice/</link>
	<description>looking for alternative explanations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 05:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://benabuya.com/2008/10/06/god-does-not-play-dice/#comment-7841</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deba.wordpress.com/?p=421#comment-7841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, there is one way that you could lose a game of chess in one move - you could immediately resign. This might sound theoretical, but when I play omnipotent opponents, it is generally the course of action I take.

By the way, you&#039;re kind of cheating in saying that as soon as a characteristic is attributed to a thing, it ceases to be an externally constructed attribute - i.e. by defining chess as a game with the rules of chess that we know and agree on, or by defining heavy as an internal property of heavy rocks, you&#039;re ignoring the fact that the rules of chess are only as good as the institutionally-led social consensus that underlies them, and that the heaviness of a rock is only as good as the nearby massive object which it attracts and which attracts it.

Just a thought.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there is one way that you could lose a game of chess in one move &#8211; you could immediately resign. This might sound theoretical, but when I play omnipotent opponents, it is generally the course of action I take.</p>
<p>By the way, you&#8217;re kind of cheating in saying that as soon as a characteristic is attributed to a thing, it ceases to be an externally constructed attribute &#8211; i.e. by defining chess as a game with the rules of chess that we know and agree on, or by defining heavy as an internal property of heavy rocks, you&#8217;re ignoring the fact that the rules of chess are only as good as the institutionally-led social consensus that underlies them, and that the heaviness of a rock is only as good as the nearby massive object which it attracts and which attracts it.</p>
<p>Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

